<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bri Manning&#039;s Blog &#187; LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brimanning.com/blog/category/social-media/linkedin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brimanning.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Developnerd&#039;s Take on Being Awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LinkedIn Making a Bad Move with Link-Sharing</title>
		<link>http://brimanning.com/blog/linkedin-making-a-bad-move-with-link-sharing</link>
		<comments>http://brimanning.com/blog/linkedin-making-a-bad-move-with-link-sharing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Manning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brimanning.com/blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could easily be just me, but I do not go to LinkedIn to get traditional news. In fact, that&#8217;s the last thing I would have ever associated with LinkedIn. That&#8217;s why I do not understand in the slightest why they would add so many link sharing features recently. To get world news I usually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could easily be just me, but I do not go to <a href="http://linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> to get traditional news. In fact, that&#8217;s the last thing I <a href="http://brimanning.com/about/linkedin" title="Bri Manning's LinkedIn">would have ever associated with LinkedIn</a>. That&#8217;s why I do not understand in the slightest why they would <a href="http://blog.linkedin.com/2010/04/21/linkedin-sharing-news/" title="LinkedIn Link Sharing">add so many link sharing features</a> recently.</p>
<p>To get world news I usually turn to my favorite link aggregator: <a href="http://popurls.com" title="News Aggregator of News Aggregators">popurls.com</a>. If I want to get the latest industry news, then I go to <a href="http://brimanning.com/about/twitter" title="Bri Manning on Twitter">my Twitter account</a>, where I&#8217;ve hand-picked developers and experts that I want to follow (with some friends thrown in there for good measure, of course!). If I want to get the latest news about what my friends, there&#8217;s <a href="http://brimanning.com/about/facebook" title="My Facebook">clearly Facebook</a>.</p>
<p>LinkedIn, on the other hand, is really about professional news in your network. If I want to keep in touch with a professional contact, or look up what someone is up to these days, that&#8217;s the first place I would go.</p>
<p>Just like you can&#8217;t out-Amazon Amazon or out-Walmart Walmart, you can&#8217;t out-Twitter Twitter. Facebook is having a similar problem, but at least they&#8217;re doing their own things as well.</p>
<p>LinkedIn should just realize who and what they are and what they are about and optimize everything they do around that. Who needs feature creep? No one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brimanning.com/blog/linkedin-making-a-bad-move-with-link-sharing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

